is the most
Anti-Communist organization in the world!
Do not let
their drive towards SOCIALISM fool you!!!
They FEAR
Communism above all else, for when a Communist
redistributes
wealth they do it with a bullet to the head.
It is that
fear that dives the NEW WORLD ORDER
It is THAT
fear which drives the worlds richest men towards
socialism!
A false socialism that eliminates the middle class.
(This
is not an endorsement for Communism which is but another Tyranny
like Fascism
BUT it DOES explain how to beat them, at the mental level)
MINIMUM WAGE
MUST BE DOUBLED NOW !
In order
to keep up with the Federal Reserves printing of over
10 trillion
dollars we will see most prices doubled by years end.
Doubling
the minimum wage must happen right NOW!!!!!!!!!!
Will it be
some FDR / Hillary hero that gives us this "NEW DEAL #2"
?
Will the
media brain washed citizens give this "NEW DEAL #2"
politician
their blind loyalty for another 80 years or will they be
smart enough
to realize that this NEW DEAL MAKER is in
league with
the greedy bankers and their central banking scam?
Let ONLY
the U.S. Treasury print ALL money once again and abolish
the greedy
Federal Reserve bank, the 3rd central bank in US history!
The Neo-Roman
/ American Experience
These movies
beach-mark our main objective while
educating
you about the U.S.A.'s most evil institution
THE FEDERAL
RESERVE BANK
JOB ONE for
every American citizen is to end the Federal Reserve Banking
System! Forget partisan politics, we all need to band together
and force Congress to insist that ONLY the U.S. Treasury will
be the only entity printing all monies once again. INTEREST FREE
and DEBIT FREE money!! JFK knew the importance of this and signed
legislation to insure that the U.S. Treasury issued silver certificates
just before he was murdered! National Debit is the greatest FRAUD
ever perpetrated on the American people!! The U.S. Treasury has
the right to print money WITHOUT any DEBIT! Our government is
corrupt if not absolutely insane! We should ALL be screaming
at the rape of our declining standard of living that inflation
causes -
LINK HERE NOW
The National
Debit is a LIE! A printing press can not create a debit! This
money comes out of thin air and we do not borrow it from any
other counties. The national debit is as phony as the printers
making it, inflating it and devaluing it daily. Your standard
of living is the unseen thief since you can account for something
that you have never gained which is a higher standard of living!
If the US Treasury printed all money we would all have a much
higher standard of living once again.
Call or write
you US representative and tell them YOU WANT to see US Treasury
printed and marked money in circulation once again. The dirty
little secret is that they already KNOW this would be money FREE
from any and all National Debit!
If it says FEDERAL
RESERVE NOTE its not money, its just DEBIT NOTE.
73,846 U.S. TROOPS DEAD !
1,620,906 PERMANENTLY DISABLED
FYI, the war
dept. does not count those who 'don't die' on the field of battle...
if you're wounded and evac'ed and die either in transport or
at a triage unit you are 'not' considered a war casualty...
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS ISSUES OFFICIAL REPORT CONFIRMING 73,000 U.S. TROOPS
KILLED IN IRAQ SAME GOVERNMENT AGENCY REPORT CONFIRMS 1.6 MILLION
"DISABLED" BY THE WAR!
On top of this major defeat
for the US and the degradation of the US defense capability against
potential enemies in East Asia etc. is the crime of not informing
the American people of these tremendous losses -- of fathers
and husbands, of young labor, of our real future from this younger
generation. And those not wounded are scared mentally -- and
they already are bringing it back home to our crumbling sabotaged
society. All I have to do is extrapolate from all the dead from
little Yakima, Washington to know that these figures must be
close
to the actual number of combat dead.
-- Dick Eastman
"Military
Men Are Just Dumb,
Stupid, Animals To Be Used
As Pawns In Foreign Policy"
- Henry Kissinger, 1973
In order for a soldier to
literary DIE for YOUR freedom do YOU not need to be 'Un-Free'
first or at least have the treat of being made 'Un-Free'? How
can the Iraqi's take away our FREEDOM? If U.S. soldiers do not
die for our freedom then do they die simply for the corporate
profit's of the privileged few? You cannot kill 300,000 Iraqi's
and claim that our U.S. fighting men and woman die in the name
of "Freedom", its absolutely absurd!!!
The people of Iraq and their
bastard leader did not plan 9/11 and that is a fact. There is
no doubt that Saddum
was a bastard leader but
the world is full of bastard leaders. Is America now in the bastard
extermination business?
For if we are, we will be
at warring and exterminating the worlds bastards for the next
millennium.
Conclusion - U.S. troops no longer die defending
American Freedom!
Killing Iraqi's can't
make you free since the Iraqi's did not threaten your freedom
in the first place.
The greatest threat to
your freedom is the Federal Reserve Bank and its phony national
debit machine!!!
A printing press DOES
NOT generate a debit!! If the money is printed of out thin air
and no Gold is
borrowed to back it from
a foreign source then the debit is just another lie in the dark.
Allow ONLY the U.S. Treasury
print all money once again! Debit free!
Explaining the core concept and motivation
for the NEW WORLD ORDER would require a
400 page long email so I will simplify
it and hope you can fill in the blanks in your mind.
The ultra rich elitists ruling classes
inact false socialism in the West. As their first act of control
they create the Social Democratic party
in the UK in late 1800's. Liberal's
and leftist's see their ideas being applied to law so they rush
to help. The Social Democrats win power.
The plan of the ultra rich is to
control and exploit using the Social Democrats they control .
In a cruel twist of fait the laws of Communism
are adopted by the the ultra rich
to exploit the working classes and not to help them. Elitists
are long term thinkers and brilliant tacticians.
If you have ever pondered at the
strange puzzle of WHY the super wealthy are the greatest promoters
of socialism in the west, now you have
your answer. Their brand of home
brewed socialism is purely done to appease those citizens whom
may have the potential of becoming a
real Communist threat. The super
rich elitists do not give a darn about true socialism. Their
seemingly endless passion and promotion of
socialism it is only used as a tool
to undermine the potential threat of any real social justice
which would mean the end of their way of life.
#1 - Communism becomes an popular idea
in Russia by the late 1890's - Years later a man named Lenin
takes over Russia in
1917 and slaughters all of the ultra rich and bankers and redistributes
their wealth back to the working class and poor of Russia
as per Communist doctrine. It is a blood bath, maybe the biggest
slaughter in modern history and the west down plays the magnitude
of this massive act of violence even
to this day. Maybe for the same reason other information blacks
out occur, fearing of copycats.
#2 - The ultra rich classes in Europe
and the West need to counter this very real threat and go to
action with their plans to counter the
socialist threat and the NEW WORLD ORDER is now in full action.
#3 - The ultra rich class in Europe
and West believe that the graduated income tax and central banking
(both planks in Communist
law) will slowly bleed all their wealth away and is becoming
a popular idea and spreading like a plague among the peoples
of Europe
and America. In America the Communist party is already 16% and
going quickly.
#4 - The ultra rich seize control of
central banking and create a graduated income tax with the help
of corrupt politicians. Their
goal is to CONTROL these SYSTEMS of taxation and money creation
as a weapon to control any worker uprisings.
#5 - They then remove gold and silver
from the monetary system and create a FAIT currency that they
can control to ultimately
control the working classes. Money is continually inflated creating
a need for higher wages for workers. A new political agenda will
arise from one political party and they will grant higher wages
thus holding working class loyalty but this party also always
raises
taxes. The opposite political party is now needed to balance
the system and these politicians offer LOW taxes and LOW inflation.
The balance in power is now set up and complete. Eventually inflation
rises to much and the workers again need higher wages.
Again the workers vote for the party that will increase the minimum
wage and as always higher salaries will be neutralized by the
central banks inflation and the standard of living remains no
better. Still the socialist politicians look like heroes in the
eyes of the
workers but these seemingly worker friendly politicians are just
puppets doing the central bankers bidding. Still the common
working people do not make the connection that higher wages mean
nothing if goods and services just cost more as a consequence.
The circle of power is now complete for the bankers and BIG corporations.
They care nothing of these high wages and simply
charge higher prices since they know it is only a game in the
workers minds.
#6 - To feed the poor masses created
from inflation they now use the graduated income tax to TAX THE
WORKING CLASSES
instead on the ultra rich classes. Since the ultra rich made
these laws they also control and twist the manor in which the
income tax is
managed, the working classes are always their target.
#7 - The ultra rich classes now pay
almost no taxes since they can easily maneuver their money through
their thousands of multinational
corporations and avoid the bulk of any income taxes.
SO the new world order is simple, the
ultra rich are playing with the concepts of Communist and Socialist
ideas to make the
working class pay MOST of the taxes so that any REAL Communist
revolution will never happen since the Elitists know when REAL
Communists redistribute wealth they just shot the ultra rich
and bankers in the head and just take it!! It is this fear that
drives the NEW
WORLD ORDER, the fear of violent worker revolt! This is a VERY
over simplified explanation and you have to do much more
research to fully appreciate the situation we are ALL in. If
you have learned to hate the New World Order remember this, they
fear
Communism above all else!!!!! It is
their greatest FEAR!! Fear of Communism It is what brought their
grand plan in operation in the first place!
Think about this very carefully and
you WILL find the secret to beating them here. If I have to spell
it out for you then your not ready,, yet.
THE NEW WORLD ORDER IN A NUT SHELL
-
An epic battle for the control of the
working classes by the ruling classes cleverly using socialism
as a false fulcrum controlled by the rich.
The working classes want WORKERS to
be in charge of socialist law and the ULTRA RICH want to be in
charge of these laws.
What is at stake is TAXATION and FINANCIAL
SLAVERY OF MANKIND. Will the working classes be taxed so heavily
that
they will be held at the poverty level OR will the worker classes
regain political power so taxation can be used to make the ultra
rich corporations and bankers pay for the 'Lions-Share' of societies
taxes?
Now you know their greatest fears and
the grand master plan of the world's elite billionaires and bankers.
As this video points out
"WHY ARE THE SUPER RICH" seemly playing with leftist
ideas???
Ideas and concepts that would
undermine their wealth and power. Western Socialism is about
control!
They are not leftists
at all, their game is to control and defuse all leftist ideas
by controlling their size, shape and form.
The Real Reasons for the War
With Iraq: (And Now Iran)
The Euro / Petro-Dollar Wars.
"If a nation expects to
be ignorant and free, it expects what never was and never will
be . . . The People cannot be safe without information. When the
press is free, and every man is able to read, all is safe."
Those words by Thomas Jefferson
embody the unfortunate state of affairs that have beset our nation.
As our government prepares to go to war with Iraq, our country
seems unable to answer even the most basic questions about this
upcoming conflict. First, why is there a lack of a broad international
coalition for toppling Saddam? If Iraq's old weapons of mass destruction
(WMD) program truly possessed the threat level that President
Bush has repeatedly purported, why are our historic allies not
joining a coalition to militarily disarm Saddam? Secondly, despite
over 400 unfettered U.N inspections, there has been no evidence
reported that Iraq has reconstituted its WMD program. Indeed,
the Bush administration's claims about Iraq's WMD capability appear
demonstrably false. [1] [2] Third, and despite President Bush's
repeated claims, the CIA has not found any links between Saddam
Hussein and Al Qaeda. To the contrary, some intelligence analysts
believe it is more likely Al Qaeda might acquire an unsecured
former Soviet Union Weapon(s) of Mass Destruction, or potentially
from sympathizers within a destabilized Pakistan.
President Bush was informed
in January 2001 of North Korea's suspected nuclear program). Despite
the obvious contradictions, President Bush has not provided a
rationale answer as to why Saddam's seemingly dormant WMD program
possesses a more imminent threat that North Korea's active nuclear
weapons program. Millions of people in the U.S. and around the
world are asking the simple question: "Why attack Iraq now?"
Well, behind all the propaganda is a simple truth -- one of the
core drivers for toppling Saddam is actually the euro currency,
the -- euro dollar symbol.
Although apparently suppressed
in the U.S. media, one of the answers to the Iraq enigma is simple
yet shocking. The upcoming war in Iraq war is mostly about how
the CIA, the Federal Reserve and the Bush/Cheney administration
view hydrocarbons at the geo-strategic level, and the unspoken
but overarching macroeconomic threats to the U.S. dollar from
the euro. The Real Reasons for this upcoming war is this administration's
goal of preventing further OPEC momentum towards the euro as an
oil transaction currency standard, and to secure control of Iraq's
oil before the onset of Peak Oil (predicted to occur around 2010).
However, in order to pre-empt OPEC, they need to gain geo-strategic
control of Iraq along with its 2nd largest proven oil reserves.
This essay will discuss the macroeconomics of the `petrodollar'
and the unpublicized but real threat to U.S. economic hegemony
from the euro as an alternative oil transaction currency. The
following is how an individual very well versed in the nuances
of macroeconomics alluded to the unspoken truth about this upcoming
war with Iraq:
"The Federal Reserve's
greatest nightmare is that OPEC will switch its international
transactions from a dollar standard to a euro standard. Iraq actually
made this switch in Nov. 2000 (when the euro was worth around
82 cents), and has actually made off like a bandit considering
the dollar's steady depreciation against the euro. (Note: the
dollar declined 17% against the euro in 2002.)
"The real reason the Bush
administration wants a puppet government in Iraq -- or more importantly,
the reason why the corporate-military-industrial network conglomerate
wants a puppet government in Iraq -- is so that it will revert
back to a dollar standard and stay that way." (While also
hoping to veto any wider OPEC momentum towards the euro, especially
from Iran -- the 2nd largest OPEC producer who is actively discussing
a switch to euros for its oil exports)."
Although a collective switch
by OPEC would be extremely unlikely barring a major panic on the
U.S. dollar, it would appear that a gradual transition is quite
plausible. Furthermore, despite Saudi Arabia being our `client
state,' the Saudi regime appears increasingly weak/threatened
from massive civil unrest. Some analysts believe civil unrest
might unfold in Saudi Arabia, Iran and other Gulf states in the
aftermath of an unpopular U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq
[3]. Undoubtedly, the Bush administration is acutely aware of
these risks. Hence, the neo-conservative framework entails a large
and permanent military presence in the Persian Gulf region in
a post-Saddam era, just in case we need to surround and control
Saudi's large Ghawar oil fields in the event of a Saudi coup by
an anti-western group. But first back to Iraq.
"Saddam sealed his fate
when he decided to switch to the euro in late 2000 (and later
converted his $10 billion reserve fund at the U.N. to euros) --
at that point, another manufactured Gulf War become inevitable
under Bush II. Only the most extreme circumstances could possibly
stop that now and I strongly doubt anything can -- short of Saddam
getting replaced with a pliant regime.
"Big Picture Perspective:
Everything else aside from the reserve currency and the Saudi/Iran
oil issues (i.e. domestic political issues and international criticism)
is peripheral and of marginal consequence to this administration.
Further, the dollar-euro threat is powerful enough that they will
rather risk much of the economic backlash in the short-term to
stave off the long-term dollar crash of an OPEC transaction standard
change from dollars to euros. All of this fits into the broader
Great Game that encompasses Russia, India, China."
This information about Iraq's
oil currency is not discussed by the U.S. media or the Bush administration
as the truth could potentially curtail both investor and consumer
confidence, reduce consumer borrowing/spending, create political
pressure to form a new energy policy that slowly weans us off
Middle-Eastern oil, and of course stop our march towards a war
with Iraq. This quasi `state secret' is addressed in a Radio Free
Europe article that discussed Saddam's switch for his oil sales
from dollars to the euros, to be effective November 6, 2000:
"Baghdad's switch from
the dollar to the euro for oil trading is intended to rebuke Washington's
hard-line on sanctions and encourage Europeans to challenge it.
But the political message will cost Iraq millions in lost revenue.
RFE/RL correspondent Charles Recknagel looks at what Baghdad will
gain and lose, and the impact of the decision to go with the European
currency."
At the time of the switch many
analysts were surprised that Saddam was willing to give up approximately
$270 million in oil revenue for what appeared to be a political
statement. However, contrary to one of the main points of this
November 2000 article, the steady depreciation of the dollar versus
the euro since late 2001 means that Iraq has profited handsomely
from the switch in their reserve and transaction currencies. Indeed,
The Observer surprisingly divulged these facts in a recent article
entitled: `Iraq nets handsome profit by dumping dollar for euro,'
(February 16, 2003).
"A bizarre political statement
by Saddam Hussein has earned Iraq a windfall of hundreds of millions
of euros. In October 2000 Iraq insisted upon dumping the US Dollar
-- `the currency of the enemy' -- for the more multilateral euro."
Although Iraq's oil currency
switch appears to be completely censored by the U.S. media conglomerates,
this UK article illustrates that the euro has gained almost 25%
against the dollar since late 2001, which also applies to the
$10 billion in Iraq's U.N. `oil for food' reserve fund that was
previously held in dollars has also gained that same percent value
since the switch. It was reported in 2003 that Iraq's UN reserve
fund had swelled from $10 billion dollars to euro dollar symbol26
billion euros. According to a former government analyst, the following
scenario would occur if OPEC made an unlikely, but sudden (collective)
switch to euros, as opposed to a gradual transition.
"Otherwise, the effect
of an OPEC switch to the euro would be that oil-consuming nations
would have to flush dollars out of their (central bank) reserve
funds and replace these with euros. The dollar would crash anywhere
from 20-40% in value and the consequences would be those one could
expect from any currency collapse and massive inflation (think
Argentina currency crisis, for example). You'd have foreign funds
stream out of the U.S. stock markets and dollar denominated assets,
there'd surely be a run on the banks much like the 1930s, the
current account deficit would become unserviceable, the budget
deficit would go into default, and so on. Your basic 3rd world
economic crisis scenario.
"The United States economy
is intimately tied to the dollar's role as reserve currency. This
doesn't mean that the U.S. couldn't function otherwise, but that
the transition would have to be gradual to avoid such dislocations
(and the ultimate result of this would probably be the U.S. and
the E.U. switching roles in the global economy)."
Although the above scenario
is unlikely, and most assuredly undesirable, under certain economic
conditions it is plausible. In fact, one of the conditions that
could create such an environment is a near unilateral U.S. led
war in the Middle East. For example, a large spike in oil prices
could create huge problems for the imperiled Japanese banking
system, the world's largest holder of U.S. dollar reserves. Unfortunately
the current Bush administration has chosen a military option instead
of a multilateral conference on monetary reform to resolve these
issues. In the aftermath of toppling Saddam it is clear the U.S.
will keep a large and permanent military force in the Persian
Gulf. Indeed, there is no talk of an `exit strategy,' as the military
will be needed to protect the newly installed regime, and to send
a message to other OPEC producers that they too might receive
`regime change' if they convert their oil payments to euros.
Another OPEC `Axis of Evil' country, Iran, will most likely switch
their oil exports to the euro currency in the near future. If
Iran switches to the euro it is highly probable that the USA would
be compelled to find any reason to invade Iran as well. Any talk
of this kind would undoubtedly cause Gold to reach upwards of
$600.00 an ounce and possibly much higher plus quickly push Silver
prices over $13.00 an ounce as the international bankers brace
for a massive decline in the global economic value of the U.S.
dollar.
PRINTED IN 2003 - Not A bad
prediction for 2003 since it is all coming true NOW!!!!!!!!!
MORE THINGS TO
THINK ABOUT
In November 2000, Iraq stopped
taking U.S. dollars for oil, and started demanding
euros instead. That was bad
news for property investors in America, Britain and Australia.
THE GOLD STANDARD
Under the Bretton Woods Treaty of 1944, each participating government
agreed that its currency would be "backed'' by gold; that
is, the government promised to buy and sell gold for a fixed price
in its own currency. As long as these promises were credible,
the exchange rates between the participating currencies were fixed.
But because of the vast array of goods and services available
in America, the U.S. dollar was the easiest currency to spend
in the global market, and consequently the most acceptable foreign
currency in other countries. The demand for dollars grew until
the late 1950s, when the recovery of Europe and Japan caused a
suspicion that there were too many dollars in circulation, so
that dollar holders began to demand gold. In 1971, in response
to the depletion of U.S. gold reserves, President Richard Nixon
announced that America would no longer keep its commitment to
give gold for dollars [1], causing the system of fixed exchanges
rates to unravel. So the U.S. dollar is now a "fiat'' currency:
its only official ``backing'' is the legal obligation to accept
it as payment in the USA and its territories.
Internationally, however, there is no
such thing as fiat money, and a currency is not acceptable unless
it is somehow guaranteed to buy something of value [2].
BLACK GOLD
In 1973, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC)
quadrupled the price of oil but continued to accept only U.S.
dollars in payment, so that the demand for dollars soared. From
then on, the dollar was effectively backed by oil instead of gold
-- and the U.S. government didn't even have to own the oil!
Because dollars can buy oil, countries
that need to import oil -- i.e. most developed countries -- will
accept dollars for their exports. Hence everyone who needs to
buy from those exporters will accept dollars as payment for other
things, and so on. To pay their bills, importers must have reserves
of dollars. To prop up their currencies against speculative attacks,
the central banks of all countries must have reserves of dollars.
To get capital, poor countries must borrow dollars, and to service
these debts they must export goods to obtain more dollars. About
2/3 of all currency reserves, more than 4/5 of all currency transactions,
more than half of the world's exports, and all loans from the
International Monetary Fund (IMF) are denominated in dollars.
As these things create demand for the dollar and shore up its
value, OPEC is the more willing to accept payment in dollars.
This self-reinforcing process is called "dollar hegemony''.
So America exports dollars and receives
real goods and services in return. America's real imports now
exceed its real exports by almost 50%, or 5% of GDP. Its net foreign
debt is more than a quarter of annual GDP, and its public debt
is about 60% of annual GDP. But when the exported dollars eventually
find their way into foreign reserves, they can only be invested
in American assets such as treasury bills, real estate, and shares.
This inflow of investment creates a surplus on the "capital
account'' and balances the deficit on the "current account''
(which includes imports, exports, interest, rent, and dividends).
If the value of the dollar rises, the current account deficit
widens because imports increase and exports fall, while the capital
account surplus narrows because investment in the country becomes
more expensive; so dollars flow out of the country and counteract
the rise in value. If the valueof the dollar falls, the opposite
effects occur. At equilibrium, the value of the dollar is that
which balances the current account and the capital account.
LAND PRICES, RENTS, AND INTEREST RATES
Investment in real estate necessarily includes investment in land,
and the supply of land is fixed. So when foreign reserves of U.S.
dollars are invested in U.S. real estate, they push up land prices.
They also push up rents, because potential renters are in competition
with potential buyers. The winners are the big property owners
(i.e. the rich). The losers are first-time buyers and renters
(i.e. the poor). So we find full-time workers living in "trailers''
(caravans) on the fringes of American cities because they do not
``earn'' enough money to buy or rent a home.
Ordinary home owners are easily convinced
that they benefit from rising land prices. But in fact, every
time a home owner moves to a new home, the higher sale price of
the old home is offset by the higher purchase price of the new
one. If the only property that you own is your home, you cannot
benefit from an increase in its value unless you somehow turn
it into a retirement income stream -- in which case you forfeit
the option of bequeathing it to your heirs, who will then be among
the losers!
The flow of foreign investment into real
estate also pushes up share prices, because land constitutes part
of the asset backing of shares. Shares are also partly backed
by other non-replicable assets ("land-like assets''), including
natural monopolies (e.g. water and electric power distribution),
statutory monopolies (e.g. patents and mineral extraction rights),
and other licenses and privileges conferred by governments. As
the market cannot produce more of these assets in response to
increased demand, foreign investment in the share market pushes
up share prices for the benefit of current shareholders.
Simple arithmetic dictates that America's
current account deficit must be either eliminated (e.g. by allowing
the dollar to depreciate, so that living standards fall) or balanced
by a stream of foreign investment. One way to attract foreign
investment is to offer high interest rates on treasury bills.
This of course forces other financial institutions, andother countries
needing foreign investment, to raise their rates in order to compete.
But the growth of currency reserves that can only be invested
in American assets has allowed America to obtain the necessary
investment with lower interest rates than would otherwise be needed
[3]. Not much of this investment finds its way into export industries
or import replacement industries, however, because the competitiveness
of these industries is damaged by the high dollar. So the investment
does not address the cause of the current account deficit, but
merely masks the symptoms while propping up the prices of land
and shares.
Another common motive for raising official
interest rates is to restrict credit creation, thereby fighting
inflation. Clearly the price of oil must be included in any realistic
measure of inflation. But because oil is priced in dollars, an
increase in oil prices attracts dollars out of the USA, reducing
the inflationary impact within the USA. Thus America is protected
from the inflationary effects of oil price rises without resorting
to high interest rates.
Low interest rates are generally desirable
because they encourage productive investment rather than hoarding
of money, and because they minimize the flow of income from debtors
to creditors (debtors being generally poorer than creditors).
However, the benefits of low interest rates extend higher up the
socio-economic scale than one might think. The price of a land-like
asset is roughly equal to its rental value divided by the real
interest rate (i.e. the interest rate net of inflation). So lower
interest rates mean higher land prices. Big property owners are
again the obvious winners. Owners with mortgages are also among
the winners, because their equity increases while their interest
payments decrease. Intending buyers do not gain so much, because
the benefit of lower interest rates is offset by the need to borrow
more; indeed, people who buy when interest rates are lowest are
actually buying at the top of the market, which is a fool's game.
THE EURO THREAT
The biggest impediment to global hegemony of a single currency
-- whatever that currency may be -- is the desire for diversity
in investment [4]. Dollar hegemony was secured by the size of
the U.S. economy and the pricing of oil in dollars. But if a second
currency were to enter the oil market, the desire for diversity
would soon establish that currency as a second general-purpose
trading and reserve currency, especially if that currency were
legal tender in an economy comparable in size to the USA.
In 1999, eleven member states of the
European Union (EU) adopted the euro as a common accounting currency.
Greece joined the Euro Zone a year later. On January 1, 2002,
the twelve countries withdrew their old money from circulation,
completing the biggest currency reform in history.
The Euro Zone already has a bigger share
of world trade than the USA. In particular, it imports more oil
than the USA and is the main trading partner of the Middle East.
It offers higher interest rates than the USA, but does not have
a huge foreign debt or trade deficit. Member states must accept
tight constraints on budget deficits, and the European Central
Bank has an exceptionally strong mandate to preserve the purchasing
power of its currency. These things inspire confidence in the
euro. It was perhaps for that reason that in 2002, Russia and
China started converting some of their currency reserves from
dollars to euros, while North Korea abandoned the dollar and started
using euros for trade. The strength of the euro also encourages
expansion of the EU and puts pressure on current members Denmark,
Sweden and the U.K. to join the Euro Zone. In December 2002, ten
new countries were accepted for EU membership with effect from
May 2004. This will create a common market of 450 million people,
which will buy more than half of OPEC's oil.
So the only remaining argument for preferring
dollars to euros is that dollars can buy oil. As that argument
does not affect OPEC, it would make sense for OPEC members to
convert most of their reserves to euros by mid 2004. If OPEC members
were then to price their oil in euros, whether for all customers
or only for customers in the Euro Zone, they would increase demand
for the euro, causing a handsome increase in the value of their
new euro reserves. Similar arguments apply to non-OPEC oil exporters
such as Norway and Russia. In short, if the oil-exporting nations
treat the euro on its merits, dollar hegemony will end.
If the demand for dollars falls, the
consequences for America are clear. Fewer dollars will be exported
for goods and services, and fewer dollars will return to prop
up the real estate market and stock market. The dollar prices
of American land and shares will fall, and the real values will
fall further because the dollar itself will be devalued. The excess
dollars on the global market will flow back into the American
domestic market, where they will be spent on goods and services,
fueling inflation and increasing exports. The increased exports
will reduce the current account deficit to compensate for the
slowdown of foreign investment, but will also reduce domestic
living standards as measured by consumption of goods and services.
Inevitably, the Federal Reserve will raise interest rates in order
to reduce the inflation, support the dollar, attract more foreign
investment, and delay the day of reckoning on which America will
have to pay its way by producing and exporting real goods and
services in return for its imports. But that will not rescue the
landowners and shareholders, because, to the extent that land
and shares are not devalued by reduced foreign investment, they
will be devalued by the higher interest rates.
If interest rates are raised in America,
they will also have to be raised in other countries which have
large current account deficits, and which therefore compete with
America for foreign investment. Those countries notably include
Britain and Australia. So if the reign of the U.S. dollar ends,
land prices and share prices will fall not only in America, but
also in Britain and Australia.
ROGUE STATES
The first OPEC member to show serious disloyalty to the dollar
was Iran, which has expressed interest in the euro since 1999.
In January 2002, George W. Bush named Iran in his "axis of
evil'', provoking a wave of anti-American demonstrations reminiscent
of the Khomeini era, and undoubtedly setting back the political
and religious liberalization of that country. Undeterred, Iran
converted most of its currency reserves to euros during 2002,
and a proposal to price Iran's oil in euros has been submitted
to the central bank and the parliament.
Let us see whether the Americans find
an excuse to destabilize Iran's fledgling democracy in favour
of a dictatorship that just happens to prefer dollars to euros.
The second offender was Venezuela. In
2000, Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez called a conference on
the future of fossil fuels and renewable energy. The report of
the conference, delivered by Chavez to the OPEC summit in September
2000, recommended that OPEC set up a high-tech electronic barter
system so that members could trade oil for goods and services
without the use of dollars or any other currency. The chief beneficiaries
would be OPEC's poorer customers, who did not have large currency
reserves. Chavez made 13 barter deals. In one of them, Cuba provided
health services in Venezuelan villages.
In April 2002 there was a coup against
the twice elected Chavez. The coup was welcomed by the Bush administration
and by editorials in numerous American newspapers, but collapsed
after two days, leaving evidence that the U.S. administration
was behind it [5][6].
The third and most blatant offender was
Iraq. In October 2000, Saddam decreed that Iraqi oil would be
sold for euros instead of dollars, with effect from November 6.
Soon afterwards, Saddam converted Iraq's entire $10 billion "oil
for food'' reserve fund from dollars to euros. These events went
unreported in the U.S. media.
Given America's record of toppling elected
governments whose policies it didn't like (as in Chile, Nicaragua,
and almost Venezuela), it is hard to believe that the motives
of Operation Iraqi Freedom are as pure as its name suggests, especially
considering how cheap ``freedom'' has become in U.S. domestic
politics [see the Appendix].
Answering the allegation that the war
was all about oil, George W. Bush assured the world that Iraq's
oil belongs to the Iraqi people. But any asset priced in dollars
is at least partly an American asset because it adds to the demand
for dollars, allowing America to export more dollars and import
more goods and services. The exported dollars eventually return
and drive up land prices and share prices, making rich Americans
richer. So the test of America's sincerity will be whether the
new regime in Iraq continues to accept euros for oil.
APPENDIX: THE PRICE OF FREEDOM IN
AMERICA
It is well known that more than 100 death-row prisoners in the
USA have been found to be innocent since 1973. When we add non-death-row
prisoners found innocent after serving long periods in prison,
the number rises to over 200, most of whom were cleared by DNA
evidence in the last decade.
What is not so well known outside the
USA is that more than two thirds of these people got NO COMPENSATION.
Not even reimbursement of legal costs. Not even back-pay at standard
rates for the work they had to do in prison.
Only 15 of the 50 American States have
laws providing compensation for wrongful imprisonment. In 13 of
those States the compensation is capped, and the limit is invariably
less than what a film star would expect to receive for a defamatory
media report. In the other 35 States the legislature can pay compensation
if it wants to, which it usually doesn't. The Federal jurisdiction
has a compensation scheme under which the maximum payout is $5000
(yes, five thousand dollars).
Some wrongful convictions, though not
all, are honest mistakes. But when a wrongful conviction is discovered
and publicly admitted, any failure to compensate the victim for
years of incarceration and vilification cannot be explained by
ignorance, misunderstanding, error, lack of freedom, or (especially
in America) lack of resources. It can be explained only by callous
indifference.
REFERENCES
[1] Howard Wachtel, ``Adventures of the Dollar'' (1987) http://www.npq.org/archive/1987_fall/adventures.html
.
[2] "In the international arena...
no overarching sovereign exists to decree what is money. Instead,
a myriad of private agents must somehow reach agreement on which
currency to use... [If a currency is] to be acceptable, market
participants must be willing to hold it as a store of value. A
necessary condition of that willingness is that a currency's future
value in terms of goods and services be viewed as predictable.''
--- Alan Greenspan (Chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve), "The
Euro as an International Currency'', remarks at the Euro 50 Group
Roundtable, Washington D.C., Nov. 30, 2001, http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/speeches/2001/200111302/default.htm.
[3] An exception occurred in the late
1970s, when falling oil prices and mounting third-world debt --
both denominated in U.S. dollars -- undermined confidence in the
dollar. The Federal Reserve responded by raising interest rates
to record levels (reference [1]). Heavily indebted poor countries
are still paying for that episode. But demand for the U.S. dollar
rose again in response to the second oil shock of 1979-80.
[4] ``[T]he most important factor inhibiting
the emergence and persistence of a single vehicle currency throughout
the world is the attraction of portfolio diversification. This
can be a powerful counterforce, especially because currencies
offer far greater opportunities for diversification than most
other assets. The average price of all currencies, by construction,
is trendless, tending to increase the negative covariance within
a portfolio of currencies.'' --- Alan Greenspan, loc. cit., http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/speeches/2001/200111302/default.htm.
[5] FAIR: "U.S. Papers Hail Venezuelan
Coup as Pro-Democracy Move'', Media Advisory, April 18, 2002,
http://www.fair.org/press-releases/venezuela-editorials.html.
[6] Ed Vulliamy (New York, April 21,
2002): "Venezuela coup linked to Bush team'', THE OBSERVER,
http://www.observer.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,688071,00.html.
For the sources of the oil-currency-war
theory, see http://ist-socrates.berkeley.edu/~pdscott/iraq.html,
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/RRiraqWar.html, http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0215-05.htm,
and http://www.feasta.org/documents/papers/oil1.htm .
The RICH LIBERALS run the news paper
and they are the FALSE fiends of the poor and working man,,,,
and the game plan is working GOOD!
These people are RICH LIBERALS,,,, not
POOR liberals like the Communists where.
NO, this is new new kind of political
machine and technology drives it.
100 years from now the historians will probably have a new word
for what is happening to us now.
The media is the propaganda machine
of the FALSE LEFT WING front of the super rich.
Its the old game of playing the role
of the common peoples hero while secretly being the oppressor!!!!!
"We are going to raise minimum
wage while devaluing the dollar" Result = Hero!
But everyone's standard of living remains unchanged because every
false gift is neutralized with inflation theft.
Most Americans just need to hit rock
bottom before the lights go on, so I fear most.
Do you understand the massive scope
of this political twist in politics that the American masses
have fell for hook, line and sinker?
RICH LIBERALS,,,, Think about it and
only then will you begin to understand way they all want higher
taxes for the rich (middle class),, The foxes and guarding the
hen house.
SO how do we stop them?????
Simple,,,, WE De-fund the machine.
Call for the END of the Federal
Reserve bank!!! A PRIVATE
bank incorporated in Delaware
and NOT part of our government!
Congress has the authority
but will need MUCH encouragement from voters!!!!!!!
Our government can print its
own money without paying high interest
rates to a PRIVATE bank, are
we blind, stupid or just complacent? We are being ripped off!!!!!!!!!
Remember,
We like Republicans, Just not bad Republicans! Unlike Democrats
who defend every action of their leaders we dare to get rid of
all the BAD republicans so good republicans may be elected in
their place.A must hear!
John Kerry
and his people do NOT really believe in the confiscatory redistribution
of wealth,,,, it's just a front. They are the wealthy!!! Always
making laws to confiscate the money of the middle and working
classes to fund the votes of the poor masses, that's their goal
and it's be working for 80 years.
This conspiracy started
in 1872 in England when the British royalty funded the Democratic
Socialist party as a secret front to stop communism thus ending
any REAL confiscatory redistribution of wealth. Western socialism
is run by the rich and the elite. It is a VERY twisted plot as
you will find!!!!!!! Their game is to tax the MIDDLE/WORKING
classes and give THAT money to the poor thereby defusing any
rebellion. The middle and working classes are already rebelling
and pushing us back into a time when the industrial revolution
had us all enslaved. We need to be smarter than that !!!! We
need a new type of politics,,, not one based on Communism or
any false socialism endorsed by the masses and run by the wealthy.
When multimillionaire democratic's call out for higher taxes
for social programs and fat-cat democrats like Rockyfeller worth
$6,000,0000,000.00 back them it means only one thing! It should
send you only one message!
"WORKING PEOPLE TAKE CARE OF YOUR
POOR,,
THE SUPER RICH ARE NOT GOING TO GIVE
THEIR MONEY AWAY"
And the SUPER rich democratic Rockefeller's
of the world safely put their money into their foreign corporations
where it can be LEGALLY swindled away TAX FREE. Most American's
are dummies and can't see past their minor daily pleasures and
comfort's and THEN vote their "greed" at the end of
the day. (A people usually get the government they deserve)
If you had a foreign corporation in
Germany or Japan (forget about the Caribbean, it's for amateurs)
You would never had to pay a dime in taxes!!!!!! When foreign
corporations make a profit in this country THEN by year-end they
transfer it into their shell corporations and call it a LOSS.
They then use yet another corporation over seas and spend it
over here in this country as a foreign entity in the name of
"INVESTING IN AMERICA", what a bunch of crap AND it's
perfectly legal.
THE RICH MADE THE TAX LAWS IN THEIR
FAVOR!!! They are also the leading voice for western socialism
the GREATEST lie!!! The greatest of all trickery!
Having the super wealthy in charge
of taxation and the redistribution of wealth is a fools game,,
can you see the game plan now?
Capitalism:
The rich riding on
the backs of the poor.
Communism/Socialism:
The weak, stupid, corrupt
and lazy riding on the backs of the strong, smart, honest and
hard working.
Multicapitalism:
Giving everyone the
OPPORTUNITY to prosper equally.
Multicapitalism
The Freedom And
Opportunity Society
Multicapitalism
must be one of the most original financial philosophies ever
conceived. Just imagine a society where the government insures
that every citizen will become a successful capitalist and land
owner without excessive taxation or loss of privacy or freedom.
The left and right and the Liberal's and Conservative's may finally
have reached common ground.
Until the time Multicapitalist
government can be established we shall rebel! We shall not play
within the boundaries of the established system! We shall be
Anarchists that obey only the common law and our personal responsibilities!
We will not take the life, liberty or property of any individual
but to all other oppressive codes and socialist laws shall be
Anarchists! We shall resist! We shall be our own leaders. For
we know the fastest way to make change is to live our lives in
the way we believe TODAY! Like in all war there will be arrests
and loss of freedom but to obey is only a sure path to progressive
slavery. And when in court we shall protest vigilantly, loudly
and passionately, may we never make the mistakes of bearing our
plight and pain in silence. The system is corrupt so using the
ways of the system is a waste of time unless you plan to infiltrate
it like many of us have. The day you decide to walk the path
of your dreams you effect change in the most profound and powerful
ways imaginable! The battle begins. Live as you will NOW and
our numbers shall grow!
Ilam
The AFC is 100% for Social
Security!
Why? Many old people
can't work!
Fact: We will all get old someday and will
not be able to work as our bodies gradually give out.
Getting old has nothing to
do with laziness or finding some trick to swindle tax payers
out of their hard earned dollars with uncle Sam's help.
We do however believe that
the hand of government with the blessings of its self serving
constituency has dipped far to deeply into a fund that was ONLY
designed to keep old people out of the "Poor House".
Now-a-days millions of people
under the age of 65 are raping the fund that clearly belongs
to retired people only.
"The only differance
between a Communist party boss and a Manopilistic Capitatist
are the words PUBLIC and PRIVATE property"
Ilam
When the powers of private
money and public money are at odds with each other there is balance
and harmony. Balance is when the powers of a free market economy
and private moneys are equally matched against the powers of
social government and public moneys.
A monumental conspiracy is
when the corporate right wing and the social government left
wing form a silent alliance as we have today (The 'New Order' of the world). When the forces that are normally
at odds with each other form a silent partnership we all suffer.
Don't you ever wonder why pay rises and inflation always come
at the same time? The worker never gets ahead of the game while
the government gets its high taxes and the corporation gets its
cheap labor.
Ilam
"Left-wing extremists
are created only when they become forced to live a strongly right-wing
society and by the same token a right-wing extremist is made
when forced to exist in a strongly left-wing society. We can
than safely deduct that the best way to stop extremists is to
have a society where separate democratic republics allow for
polictical escape from forced left or right wing central governments."
Ilam
"Socialism becomes financial
fascism when a people are forced to participate financially by
the threats and powers of police punishments. That's why joining
into the order of federal socialism and taxation should be a
free choice providing true freedom"
Ilam
"Money is not the root
of all evil, excessive greed is the root of all evil"
Ilam
Communism is nothing more
than a form of monopolistic Capitalism of a different extreme
with the word public property replacing the words private property.
It's a crying shame that a hard working people oppressed by evil
imperialist kings found communism at the other end of their chains
instead of freedom.
"As the proletariat
chief addressed the people in the crowded square he ranted about
the evils of capitalism, their decadence and the exploitation
of the laboring classes by PRIVATE PROPERTY owners like
Donald Trump. He explained that in communist society there could
be no exploitation or unfairness because of the simple fact "NO
ONE, NOT EVEN HE COULD OWN PRIVATE PROPERTY" and that "ALL
PROPERTY WAS GOVERNMENT OWNED ONLY!" So you see, the accumulation
of wealth is impossible in this perfect society of fairness and
equality!!!!!
At this point the people
cheered and knew they where free of exploitation forever. They
smiled with fondness in their hearts as the proletariat chief
exited the podium. He then waved to the crowd as he climbed into
his PUBLICLY owned limousine and drove off with his PUBLICLY
paid for driver. As the large black gate opened, his PUBLICLY
owned 40 bed room government mansion was revealed. As the butler
opened the door for him his PUBLICLY paid for servants awaited
their orders. They quickly prepared his steak and lobster dinner
because he needed to get to the airport quickly as his PUBLICLY
owned jet awaited his arrival. It appears he was late for a family
vacation at his PUBLICLY owned government vacation resort home
in the south. "
Ilam
"No government knows
any limits to its power except the endurance of the people."
Lysander Spooner
Chief Justice Marshall said
in the McCulloch v. Maryland case:
"The power to tax involves
the power to destroy;
"the power
to destroy may defeat and render useless the power to create".
American Freedom Committee We are dedicated to educating grass roots leaders
and organizations about the evils of the unchecked power of both
communist politics and predatory type (monopolistic) capitalist
philosophy. We believe in "Free Capitalism" and reject
monopolistic capitalism both public and private. We believe in
Multicapitalism
with a Graduated Regulatory System. In free capitalism all are free to grow wealthy
and not just the few holding the reigns of regulatory power.
We do not teach with facts and figures but rather with philosophy.
Philosophical teachings are impossible to disprove, unlike facts
and figures that can be argued into exhaustion. A feeling cannot
be proven or disproven because it is based on intuition and emotion
which is a powerful way to teach millions at fast speed since
a feeling can be taught and conveyed 1000 times faster than facts.
Liberals have learned this secret a long time ago and have brought
the balance of power too far to the left. Now the right must
use the 'philosophies of feeling' to re-balance power to the
center but not too far!
From 1776 to 1913 there was no significant
inflation in America. Paper money was based on gold and the U.S.
treasury was in charge of coining all money in the free market.
At the turn of the 1900th century many Americans were fascinated
with socialism as was most of the world at that time. In 1913
America received two Marxists type laws which were to be the
graduated income tax system (The 2nd plank of the Communist manifesto)
and centralized control of credit and interest rates (The federal
reserve bank or the 5th plank of the Communist manifesto).
Since 1913 we have experienced over
50 inflation splits in the value of the dollar directly because
of the effects of socialist economic manipulation of the free
market economy. Inflation is ultimately the mechanism that the
market uses to seek balance any time artificial financial manipulation
is imposed on any free market. The poor are still poor and the
rich just raise their prices and nothing good happens except
changing the volumes of federal reserve credits necessary to
pay for labor and to purchase goods. So what have we really accomplished
if the market can't be tricked or made more fair? We simply gave
the "Party of the poor" a free ticket to do as they
please as long as they redistribute wealth. The recipients of
wealth redistribution would now agree to look the other way at
any and all forms of government corruption. A partnership was
born by offering absolute power in exchange for a federal paycheck
or entitlement check.
Socialists cleverly say that we need
to keep raising wages to keep up with capitalist inflation but
we now understand that the chicken really come before the egg.
Inflation is instead a direct result of socialists manipulating
the free market thus requiring their own continued intervention
making the socialist economy self perpetuating as well as economically
addictive.
We don't need socialists to keep ahead
of inflation because they cause the inflation in the first place.
If you stand back and see the big picture it becomes easy to
see. 1776 to 1913 zero inflation. 1913 too present over 5000%
inflation. In 1776 and loaf of bread was 5 cents. In 1913 a loaf
of bread was still only 5 cents. In 1998 a loaf of bread is $1.50
and the poor are still poor!!! Since the market is fluid we can't
always predict that a minimum wage increase will cause an immediate
inflation but it will happen in time as the market eventually
catches up and the financial waters seek their natural levels.
The only true financial justice would
be to adopt a Multicapitalist economy that regulated OPPORTUNITY
instead of wealth so all people could have a fair chance at success
and happiness. All we need to do is regulate the OPPORTUNITY
of the EXTREME rich so thousands of smaller capitalists could
prosper in an otherwise monopolistic market of the rich and powerful.
Taking the money of the rich amounts to common theft but handicapping
them just might be the real key to slowing down powerful people
in a way that left-wing as well as right-wing thinkers just may
agree on.
"My dear friends, one haunting
question you must ask yourself daily is why there are so many
mega-rich socialists in the world. Are they truly trying to give
their money away to the poor or just cleverly diverting them
from any type of true successes. The message from the billion
dollar bankers to hollywoods millionaire directors is that they
love the poor. The truth is they would rather give the poor a
free lunch than give them an opportunity to take a piece of their
pie via competition on a truly level playing field that now only
panders to the insiders"
Ialm 1984
Multicapitalism is basically a financially
driven platform designed to offer freedom and equal prosperity.
We do not recommend getting involved in moral legislation as
this is a job for the people and not the politicians. We believe
that moral legislation (Drugs, sex, abortion, criminal punishment
etc, etc, etc.) does not belong in the hands of any elected officials
but rather in the hands of citizenry by direct democratic vote
(plebiscite) and then separated by state lines. It is extremely
important to divide moral or societal legislation by a "republican
form of government" (Separate States) so any peoples in
sharp disagreement can choose an alternative state to move to
and find his or her freedom with others that agree as they do.
Only in this republican government system can all people be happy
at the same time while nationalist government assures that 50%
of the population will be very angry. All people must have the
freedom of choice to live as they feel while not imposing their
choices on others that feel differently.
We operate only as a "Mole Party"
that stealthily place's it's self in the midst's of existing
parties. We call ourselves "Moderate Democrats" or
"New Republicans" and we gain immediate influence in
this way because we have a strong belief that freedom can't wait
forever.
The "New Republicans"
believe in "Multi-Capitalism." What is it???
The Freedom And Opportunity
Society
Where a Liberal might say "It's
not fair that Bill Gates has all that money."
A Multi-capitalist might say "It's
not fair that we can't be part of the success of a billion dollar
software industry."
The Liberal mind wants to supposedly
punish the rich, the Multi-Capitalist wants to be as successful
as the rich by working and aims to get there by creating the
opportunity to get a piece of the action by a system of
'graduated regulation' -- capitalist opportunity for all!!! The
creation of the ultimate society. Freedom, opportunity, prosperity
and happiness for all people equally by working, but not working
in vain.
In our philosophies we teach that a
balance of right-wing and left-wing power is very beneficial
to the happiness of the average citizens' way of life. Only when
we go too far to the left or to the right are we all in danger
of becoming public or private slaves. If you are power
hungry you will not like this page... however if you believe
in freedom and equal happiness through the philosophies of
'Multi-Capitalism,' (capitalist prosperity and opportunity
for all people equally) you will love it!!!!
DON'T WAIT FOR A MULTI-CAPITALIST LEADER
TO COME TO YOUR TOWN. THIS IS A NEW MOVEMENT AND YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE
FOR PUSHING IT FORWARD. YOU ARE THE NEW LEADERS.
FIND TRUTH FOR A BETTER WAY OF LIFE,
BECOME A TEACHER AND HELP OTHERS TO UNDERSTAND THE PHILOSOPHIES
OF MULTI-CAPITALISM.
An understanding
of human nature: The ancient
rivalism of communism and capitalism goes back as far as written
history and beyond. In fact, modern archeologists have found
repeated evidence that the poorer nomadic tribes of ancient Europe
repeatedly invaded the villages of the richer settled tribes,
since they had more food and material possessions. Yes, class
envy was an intricate part of human nature even as far back as
20,000 years ago. Throughout the centuries, wise men of the world
found a unique way of countering class envy by a concept called
"charity." If you shared your food, wealth and ultimately
the technical skills to make your own food and wealth you would
befriend thine enemy. Peace and happiness through shared Capitalism
Continued
Is The Rebirth Of The New World Roman Empire Upon
Us?
What are we doing to ourselves
and where are we headed?
(Photo of Roman Empire at
peak 116 AD)
"and when they are thirsty
they will have cool fresh water and when they are hungry they
will have food and when they are cold and wet they will have
shelter and when they are sick they will be healed and their
children will be educated, fed and clothed. And when they have
worked hard they will be rested and allowed leisure and be given
dignity and when they they have given all and can no longer work
they will be cared for until they pass. Only in this way can
we secure their loyalty and avoid rebellion"
Julius Caesar, (counsel
of slave owners speech)
(Sounds like socialism to
me! Web Master)
"they are a strong people
so force will only strengthen them and unite them. To take control
of their territories we must first have them join us thereby
accepting Roman society and its freedom's of pleasure. Once they
have been seduced we must gradualy disarm them so not to alarm
them and once disarmed only then can we absorb their lands into
the Roman order" Julius Caesar(at the time of
the eastern conquests)
"slaves may never be
allowed the right of weaponry or property". Julius Caesar
"Our main agenda is
to have all guns banned! We must use what ever means possible.
It doeset matter if you have to distort facts or even lie. Our
task of creating a Socialist America can only succeed when those
who would resist us have been totally disarmed"
Sarah Brady in a memo sent to Senator Howard
Metzenbaum (D) January 1994
We are people
that are for a society under common law
No Victim, No
Crime!
A must hear!
---------------------------------------------------------------------- A must hear!
Since times even before written history,
human beings have struggled for freedom against the stronger,
the more powerful, the kings, the tyrants, the dictators and
even in modern times the social political orders that would enslave
them. Every so often we people get it right and develop a political
system with a set of rules that ensures freedom as absolute as
this delicate balance can be insured. The old common laws were
such a set of laws. America's founding fathers wrote the U.S.
Constitution using the ancient European Common laws as a guide
and we lived under common law as a new country for the first
130 years in freedom. President Lincoln used Common law as a
basis for freeing the slaves and the Common laws continued as
this counties dominant laws until 1913, then came the "SOCIALISTS".
These new age social architects rolled over the power of the
Common laws with their social laws and civil laws for the following
80 years. The socialists studied the U.S. Constitution with a
fine toothed comb and managed to twist and turn its laws, content
and massages to reflect modern socialism, thus creating a new
social order in America. Their form of governing treats us like
children, taking away our freedoms to choose right from wrong
in the name of security and safety.
Common law ensures the highest possible
degree of freedom by simply punishing any misuse of that freedom.
In fact under Common law the Government could not take your Life,
Liberty or Property away from you until the exact moment in time
you took some ones Life, Liberty or Property away from them first!
No Victim,
No Crime
If your actions
did not produce a victim there simply is no crime!
An incredibly high degree of freedom
coupled with a high degree of responsibly for any misuse of that
freedom. Personal responsibility and freedom must always go hand
in hand.
Just think of all the times in today's
modern socialist society that you are punished, ticketed, fined,
jailed and otherwise stripped of your rights to choose when you
have produced 'No victim'.
Even when you have not yet taken away
another persons Life, Liberty or Property, your modern socialist
government still takes away your natural rights as residents
of this planet and treats you like children. Such is the nature
of socialist government, it is simply a new mommy and daddy for
children over 18 years of age. They dole out your allowance and
punishments as they see fit and of coarse, for your own good
because socialist government knows what's good for you and you
obviously don't.
Under the old and STILL legal Common laws, it would be impossible for officials to issue
fines and tickets legally. Only since we adopted "social"
or "civil" laws did the Common laws lose much of their
protective powers. Every time we sign our names to a license
or permit we lose our Common law rights voluntarily by our own
hand.
For instance, A common law marriage
is simply a legal marriage WITHOUT A STATE LICENSE. For over
4000 years people were legally married without asking the permission
of the state. Only since the times of Karl Marx, Adoph Hilter
and other social engineers did we need to ask the state for the
permission for our natural rights to live, love and exist. Under
Common laws everybody in America has a legal right to exist.
The word "exist" in Common law means to eat, fish,
hunt, gather food, build shelter and earn a living without asking
any bodies permission! Asking for permission to exist is the
politics of social engineering and once you have traded in your
Common law rights in exchange for government privileges they
can be taxed, licensed, fined and other wise taken away from
you forever. The topic of Common law is a tricky topic and deserves
your study time before you start asserting your God given Common
laws rights to any trigger happy officials.
Most people link of the word holocaust
with the Jewish holocaust
at the hands of the Nazis. However,
it's important to be aware and open about all major violations
of human rights by governments.
When Hitler was asked about the problems
of early persecution of Jews, he replied, "no one remembers
the Turkish
slaughter of the Armenians". As
a cyber-memorial to the uncountable souls vanquished by evil
ignorant people, I
offer the following summary of the
largest recent mass slaughters of people by Governments and dictators.
1901 - 1919 1 million Armenians as
part of ethnic cleansing by Ottoman Turks
1950 - 1974 30 million chinese by communists
(the same people who recently slaughtered their own students)
1925 - 1940 20 million members of the
former soviet union by Stalins communists
1940 - 1945 20 million citizens and
soldiers of the former soviet union by Nazis
1941 - 1955 5 million Germans as a
result of W.W.II Many of these were solders who had to be killed,
but many were POWs
slaughtered by the Soviets and Citizens
intentionally bombed by the Allies as part of a campaign that
included more than Military
targets.
1939 - 1945 6 million Jews by Nazis
across most of Eastern Europe. This is considered the most offensive
act in History since it
targeted one group so "efficiently".
There are people who deny that this occurred, but if you check
out this response by the
Skeptics Society you'll see that the
holocaust did occur. (unfortunately, hate groups posing as non-PC
researchers are spreading
the lie of denial to a growing percentage
of Americans)
1939 - 1945 6 million other peoples
(gays, resisters, catholics, etc) by Nazis in death camps
1952 - 1960 .5 million Hindus and Moslems
by each other during separation of India and Pakistan (tensions
still remain)
1968 - 1976 2 million Cambodians by
communists
1969 - 1984 2 million Ugandans by a
series of tribal wars
1960 - 1996 2 million Hutu and Tutsi
tribe members by each other.
1989 - 1.5 Sudanese Christians and
animists by northern Moslems (this area is also afflicted by
slavery)
And of coarse Rwanda,,,
and we wait here for the next one as usual,,,,,,,,,???
There can
still be TYRANNY in a democratic country if 51% vote the
freedom away
from the other 49% for their own financial benefits.
Nationalist MOB RULE is not good democracy!
RIGHT'S MUST BE ABSOLUTE and out of the hands of voters. No one
should ever be able to vote rights away from other people INCLUDING
financial rights.
National Mob-Rule (central democracy)
has failed over and over with people eventually voting money
away from the other people and the society eventually financially
collapses. What do you do to stop a DEMOCRATIC people from voting
the financial rights away from an angry and over taxed working
class?????
The problem is largely caused by the
beneficiaries of taxation. Also public employees i.e. - city,
county, and federal workers growing in numbers, realizing that
high taxes gives them more jobs and more pay rises (These people
also vote). The government workers should not have a right to
vote in matters that mean more taxes and government jobs as this
is a MAJOR conflict of interest!!!!! The answers to happiness
lay in MULTI-CAPITALISM, COMMON LAW and REPUBLICANISM (decentralized
local rule).
Some states will make bad financial
decisions and go bankrupt and that's how we keep the balance
of power. Financial responsibility and the pain of mismanagement
are problems that we have all faced and learned from in our lives
at one time or another. The pain of bad decisions keeps us vigilant
and on our toes while a Safety Net begins to feel more like a
hammock the more it is used. The Feds should NEVER financially
help bankrupt states as this starts the cycle of nationalism
all over again.
For those
of you who think AFC is a right wing anti-government organization
you could not be further from the truth. The problem with this
United States government is that it is OWNED by the corporate
right wing which pretends to be left wing with social programs
much like Hitler did in his national SOCIALIST party.
This Current
Government is far from being left wing. The wealthy democrats
that call themselves left wing are the biggest joke! Socialism
never EVER equals left wingism! Socialism that is right wing
driven and re-invented in its image is also called socialized
slavery of laboring classes (study ancient Rome)
The problem with socialists
is that they are so "Hell Bent" to their cause and
they cannot believe corporations could EVER possibly be in control
of quasi forms of socialism. When they hear the word socialism
and they follow like blind sheep without thought as to WHAT kind
of socialism it is. This WESTERN socialism we have that is ruled
by the super rich is a massive perversion of socialism for true
socialism is controlled by the poor and the working classes.
WHAT IS THE
NEW ORDER OF THE WORLDS?
(The New
World Order)
HOW TOUGH
IS IT TO UNDERSTAND?
Sometimes
in order to understand math we have to SIMPLIFY
an equation
down to its ABSOLUTE minimal true number.
Everybody
can understand a simple equation!
8/24 = 4/12 =
2/6 = 1/3 (Simplification)
The "New
World Order" Simplified =
"Government/Corporate
cooperation" = An unnatural balance of power.
What is the
NATURAL order of power?
"Government
/ Corporate COMPETITION"
When the Government,
corporations and insurance companies are at odds with each other we live in a world with
high wages, low taxes, affordable insurance and freedom.
When the Government,
corporations and insurance companies form a silent alliance we
live in a world of high taxes, low wages, ridiculous insurance rates & policies and of coarse, oppression!
Explaining
the "New World Order" is that simple!
Try it out
on someone today!
THE
AFC IS
UNDER GROUND - NO EMAIL Accessed
(12473222- Times)
Anyone may reprint any
info on this web site. The HTML on web site may be copied and
cloned.
Clone web sites can be
put up by you to spread the message of freedom.
In fact, this page could
just be a clone of the original page that is somewhere else.
You never know.
BAIT
f time has no end and the universe
has been here literally fo
ever could i
Bait provided
by KBR / Haliburtonble
Senator Barack
Obama, Governor Bill Richardson, Senator Hillary
Clinton and Ruth Harkin stand during the national anthem.
Barack Hussein Obama's
photo (that's his real name)......the article
said he REFUSED TO NOT ONLY PUT HIS HAND ON HIS HEART
DURING THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, BUT REFUSED TO SAY
THE PLEDGE.....how in the world can a man like this expect to
be
our next Commander-in-Chief?
The Neo-Roman
/ American Experience
73,846 U.S. TROOPS DEAD !
The Freedom And
Opportunity Society
Is The Rebirth Of The New World Roman Empire Upon
Us?
ever could i
